Saturday, 3 April 2010
Assignment 1
Exercise 12
What: The brief of this exercise was locating a area with a neutral horizon and compose several photos where the horizon was in differing positions in the frame.
Where: White Sands, East of Dunbar
When: Just after noon.
How: I locked the camera of in a tripod and by tilting the camera up and down took photographs where the horizon was either in the middle, towards the top of the frame and towards the bottom of the frame. Each photo was then examined to see what impact moving the horizon had done to the composition of the photograph.
The first sequence of photographs I took for this exercise when reviewed before posting did not look “right”. Due to the complete lack of clouds on the day, the sky appeared as just a blue bank which just did not appeal to me at all. I waited until I had a day where it was not raining and I had some clouds in the sky before reshooting the sequence. As before I locked the camera off on a tripod and just moved the head back and forwards to reposition the horizon.
The first photograph is where the horizon is positioned at the top of the image, almost out of the frame completely.
f/22 1/30 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
I like this photograph as the beach stretches off into the distance, and the tide line draws the eye from left to right into the image. The horizon is so far off into the distance that you almost think you can see the curvature of the earth.
The second photograph the camera was raised slightly so that the horizon was now in the frame and the foreground was reduced slightly
f/22 1/40 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
In this photograph the foreground looses a little of its impact, although now you can see the clouds in the sky. I feel that my eye is drawn less to the foreground and the tide line in the mid-ground, but instead I feel that I am drawn more towards the horizon.
The third photograph the camera was again raised slightly so that the horizon was now almost right in the middle of the frame.
f/22 1/40 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
In this photograph the sky has a greater impact on the image and that it is now balancing off the ground below, again I still feel drawn to the beach part of the image due to the patterns and shapes of the stones, but I also feel my eye being drawn up into the sky to examine the clouds.
The fourth photograph the camera was again raised slightly so that the horizon was now right in the middle of the frame.
f/22 1/50 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
In this photograph the horizon is almost bang in the middle of the frame. There is little of the beach foreground left. I feel that my eye is allowed to roam around the image, as the image is quite balanced .
The fifth photograph the camera was again raised slightly so that the horizon was now a little below the middle of the frame and the sky was now the dominant part of the image.
f/22 1/50 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
I feel that there is little to separate this image from where the horizon is in the middle. There is little of the beach left in the foreground. The eye is drawn now the beach into the mid-ground and the horizon. The sky is well balanced here and creates balance in the image between the elements below and above the horizon.
The sixth photograph the camera was again raised slightly so that the horizon was now well below the middle of the frame and now is positioned almost at a third of the image from the bottom
f/22 1/50 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
Looking back at this image, although the horizon was positioned straight across the image, it appears that it is slanted slightly to the left. This is a bit of an optical illusion caused by the shape of the beach in the mid-ground on the right hand side of the image. I quite like this image as I am drawn up to the sky and to the clouds. It helps to show the depth of field of the image and show that there is a great distance off to the horizon.
The seventh and last photograph the camera was again raised slightly so that the horizon was now almost at the bottom of the frame.
f/22 1/50 ISO 100 18mm (35mm Equivalent 27mm)
I feel in this image that the depth of field and distance have been lost. The sky dominates the image and with almost no foreground and the horizon being so low that there is now an imbalance between all the elements in the photograph.
Saturday, 20 March 2010
Invigoration
Wednesday, 17 March 2010
Blogger Upload Issues
Monday, 8 March 2010
Exercise 11
Where: At Home
When: Just before noon.
How: I decided to look back over some photographs I had taken previously, I finally selected 7 photographs I had taken as part of a one photograph a day project that I had completed 515 days of.
As I first looked over these photographs I found it quite hard to identify the simple elements showing how balance works in each of the photographs. I decided to draw over the photographs with a coloured box or line to identify an element. Once I had identified the elements I then drew a balance weighting scale showing what I thought the balance is.
1. Chair on Beach
I was able to identify the chair on the left and the block of rocks on the right as two elements. I coudl have also Identified the horizon as a line of balance too.
The weighting scale showing the balance.
2. Fly on Buttercup.
I identified the fly as the main element of the photograph. I then examined the blades of grass going off at odd angles out of the frame. I chose them as the elements for balance as they push outwards and due to the focal depth and the out of focus background they move the eye back to the flower and the fly.
3. Tree Highrise
Both elements together in the middle of the image create the balance of this image. I chose only to show these two elements as I felt with the sky that the balance was very top heavy.
4. Smoke Coils
Each coil of smoke draws the eye upwards to the next, I could have just had the fours elements sitting on top of each other in the diagram, but I really wanted to show that the four elements together balance up each other.
5. Triangle light
6. Castle at Night.
The two smaller elements together are balanced by the larger element which they merge into. This creates the balance between the three items.
7. Wet web.
Exercise 10
Where: Dynamic Earth, Edinburgh
When: Mid Morning. The weather was dry but cold.
How: I used two different lenses for this exercise, a telephoto and a wide angle. I decided on these focal lengths as I wanted to demonstrate the resulting difference in perspective.
I was going to use the Dynamic Earth building for this exercise, however there was a politic party meeting on and the area was filled with television camera teams, journalists and politicians. I then decided on the Dynamic Earth Sign outside the building. I could get a good distance away from it, about 40 feet and I could get up close to it without getting knocked down by a car or bus.
I took the first photograph from about 40 feet away using a telephoto lens.
f7.1 1/200 ISO 250 180mm (35mm Equivalent 270mm)
I took the second photograph from about 3 feet away using a wide angle lens
f7.1 1/200 ISO 250 14mm (35mm Equivalent 21mm)
Looking at the two images on my screen, straight away I spotted that was the difference in the background; the telephoto image has a flatter feel to it as there is only the wall behind the subject. While in the wide angle image I can clearly see sky, plants and wall. The wide angle image has a deeper perspective as you can see off into the distance. The telephoto image only shows some of the wall and is flatter in perspective as you cannot judge the distance between the subject and the wall, but it does make it stand out better from the background.
The wide angle image gives the impression that the subject has a greater distance between the parts of the scene itself. You can tell that the globe is quite large and that there is a foreground, middle and background demonstrating the distance between the viewer and the subject.
The telephoto image does not demonstrate this effect, for example the circular bar around the subject does not give the impressions that there is a great distance between the rear of the subject and the front, and you cannot tell how far the globe is from the wall and how far it is from the viewer.
As before I had not really thought about the effect that using a telephoto lens has on the perspective of a photograph. This exercise has made the start to think about how I want to photograph as subject and whether or not I should use a telephoto lens or a wide angle lens. There will be times when a telephoto lens could be used where in fact a wide angle lens and moving close into the subject would be more suitable.
From this exercise and Exercise 8 I now know that there are times when I am just not close enought to my subject, forcing me to use a telephoto lens rather than thinking about how to compse an image and in fact get closer to it giving a greater depth of field and a better viewpoint.
Exercise 9
What: The brief of this exercise was locate a subject which was a good distance away and using a combination of lenses and focal lengths, move from a wide angle view of the subject to a zoomed in tight view of the subject
Where: White Sands, East of Dunbar
When: Just after noon.
How: I decided to use a combination of lenses to photograph a lighthouse which was on the other side of the bay. I started at 11mm and moving through the range of this lens, I moved to an 18-55mm lens before finishing with a telephoto 70-300mm lens
f11 1/8 ISO 100 11mm (16mm at 35mm equivalent)
I quite like this photo as the curve of the rocks in the foreground lead you off to the horizon where the lighthouse sits.
f11 1/80 ISO 100 14mm (21mm at 35mm equivalent)
however I feel that the 11mm image is better composed as it has more of a curve, showing the bay
and leading into the photograph.
f11 1/80 ISO 100 16mm (24mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/125 ISO 100 18mm (27mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/160 ISO 100 35mm (52mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/200 ISO 100 45mm (67mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/200 ISO 100 55mm (82mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/160 ISO 100 70mm (105mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/200 ISO 100 86mm (129mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/200 ISO 100 135mm (202mm at 35mm equivalent)
f 11 1/200 ISO 100 195mm (292mm at 35mm equivalent)
f11 1/160 ISO 1200 300mm (450mm at 35mm equivalent)